Content Composer Review » plagerism changer

Will Plagiarism Ever Be Acceptable?- Article Rewriter

dustybin — Fri, 21 May 2010 14:08:00 +0000

It is a real pain, but significantly easier than forking over that $5000 to pay someone else to do . Institutions are constantly warning their students about the harsh penalties that one can incur by plagiarizing someone’s work. Once these concepts that were long considered by philosophers such as Locke were actually implemented in a country, laws protecting written works soon became part of this concept of private property. Well, if you live in the “Westernized” world you will be harshly criticized for taking this view if you try it in the academic world. Proofreading Tips & Tricks – Do it Like the Pros!

Interested In These?

Article Writing – Avoid Plagiarism Complaints

dustybin — Wed, 01 Aug 2007 09:39:22 +0000

With the rise in spun or rewritten article submissions has come a new problem. Article directories that insist on original content and actively check for it – sites such as EzineArticles.com are now suspending user accounts for using plagiarised content in their articles.

Sometimes the suggestion is justified – too many people still think that changing a few words in a PLR article makes it unique and gives them copyright.

However, many users of rewriting tools are simply the victims of circumstance. What happens is that the writer researches and creates a genuinely original article, written in his own voice and with an orginal slant. Then the writer uses Content Composer or other rewriting or spinning tools to create multiple versions of the same article – again a valid approach.

The problem is that with some/most tools all that happens is that the writer makes several versions of the article and then the phrases or sentences are mixed together from the different versions, creating many new versions of the article. When these articles are submitted then any plagiarism detection tool will pick up that a particular phrase has been used in more than one version of the article and it is flagged as being plagiarised/copied work.

ContentComposer is not so likely to have this problem as it uses both substitution at the phrase/sentence level, but also at the individual word level – one of theÂ reasons it is so useful for creating good articles from the LSI (latent semantic indexing)Â perspective.

But, even users of Content Composer can come unstuck!

However there is a solution.

Keep a paper trail/audit trail of all your work. Some tools make this easier than others, but when EzineArticles ask you to prove that your work is really your own some kind of record is very handy!

Ona simple level, PLR Spinner from Cuztech enables the user to simply cut and paste all the intro paragraphs into a single text file. Showing any enquirer the dated list of paragraphs and titles should suffice.

With Content Composer a simple copy/paste of the original document setup window with its tokens should demonstrate what has been done and a copy of the text file itself would be confirmation. The important thing is to keep these records and not to discard them just because the article has been used!

As the article marketing enviornment becomes more sophisticated we need to keep up to date with developments and use tools that enable us to manage change within our internet marketing business.

Interested In These?

Automatic Text Rewriter: Content Creators Holy Grail

dustybin — Fri, 23 Mar 2007 15:36:03 +0000

Websites eat content, they devour articles and of course our readers seek good quality content.

As webmasters and site owners we seek to feed the needs of the search engines and our readership because we know that if we have nothing to offer them then they will not even come to our pages. For this reason many of us have been seeking the ‘holy grail’ the automatic text rewriter that can create good quality content in less time than writing the material ourselves and for less money than payingÂ a ghostwriter to write for us. Sadly, as one of those people I have to say that there are plenty ofÂ automatic article rewriters around, but none of them is capbable of creating good quality content.

At the end of the day we still have to do the work. BUT, we can use tools to help us use our time effectively. We can use tools that intelligently help us manage keywords, enable us to check on our ghostwriters – that they are writing genuinely original content and yes, very importantly, to produce multiple versions of articles that are readable and informative, written using natural language and good style

Interested In These?

Using Synonyms to Create Unique Articles

dustybin — Thu, 15 Mar 2007 18:27:35 +0000

Synonym substitution – the content maker takes an article and then changes words, usually using synonyms (words with the same or similar meaning to each other) so that the content appears to be different. This process can be done by hand using a word processr such as Open Office or MicroSoftâ€™s Word. Over the past year we have seen software designed to make the task automatic, or semi-automatic.

This is a popular technique for creating unique content. There are many software packages and scripts that promise rapid success when using this technique. At first glanceÂ synonym substitutionÂ makes a lot of sense. By changing a word with a particular meaning for another word of similar meaning the writer can rapidly/quickly/speedily/hastily create an article that appears/seems/looks to be quite different from the original. But the technique is not perfect. Very often words mean one thing in one context but have a different meaning in another. So a sentence that makes sense with one word can be nonsense when your software chooses/culls/elects/singles/craves/hankers an inappropriate substitute.

There are two main ways of doing synonym/word substitution. Firstly one can do the job manually, simply going through the article and using a thesaurus, either on paper, or online and choosing words to change. This isÂ a very slow process unless one has a very large personal vocabulary. The slowness is the reason most writers tend to use automated systems. Synonym substitution software can be very fast but there are two problems. Unless the writer has a very large personal vocabulary he or she can not always know which words suggested will be appropriate and so poor choices will be made. If the substitutions are left to the computer then poor choices will absolutely be made! Some interesting synonym substitution examples.

Another drawback of synonym substitution is that it does nothing to change the structure of an article. A human might be fooled by a few word changes but a computer duplication checking algorithm will not and so there is little point in using synonym substitution on its own. As a part of an integrated content system that employs multiple techniques to ensure good quality results from the point of view of both humans and search engines word substitution can be very effective, as longÂ as the results are carefully monitored by the user.