I use Content Composer, have done since it first came out many months ago. It is a very useful tool for managing the process of content creation. It is hard to see how JetSpinner could suggest that Content Composer is a clone of their product, not least because CC has been around for longer, I think, than JetSpinner and the other basic spinner clones that have recently sprung up like mushrooms on a damp morning.Like all tools this one will do nothing by itself and so you will read no claims of results in terms of money made or rankings achieved from me. Just as I make no claims as to the search engine rankings attributable to my computers – they are just tools!I use Content Composer to manage my work flow. On an individual level I use it to write articles that are targetted to keywords and phrases, where I get feedback as to how the article is shaping up in terms of the content and structure. I use the built in content database to seek research, ideas and beat writers block. The raft of thesauruses (thesaurii ?) help me to find appropriate words.
If I want to generate multiple copies of content then I use CC to insert keywords from my keyword lists, produce variable titles and different versions of the article, this done in various ways according to my needs.
Sometimes I use a more basic tool such as PLR Spinner from Cuztech or Content Spooler for rapid, basic hit ‘n run tasks. These tools certainly have a place.I am just starting to get to the point of managing other people’s work and here there are more tools to help me. I already use the plagiarism detector and the comparison tools, but soon I will be providing ghostwriters with a copy of Content Composer Lite, a version of the software that is designed to enable users to write content to my specifications and in such a way that the output meshes with my needs. So they will have my keyword lists, be able to see how well they are doing at meeting my goals and I will be happy because I get the content in a form I can use without re-editing to get rid of double line spaces, fixed width formatting, junk top and bottom and horrid smart quotes, no more encoding issues either.Users of Article Announcer, Themezoom, Orwell and PortalFeeder will like the integration with those systems. If you are not likely to be interested in such tools then, well, CC is likely not your bag either.
This is not a tool for all. If you are simply rattling off a few articles and want to get a few easy variations then, yes use JetSpinner et al, the cheaper the better. If you want to use a system that will help you manage and grow your business by providing requisite functionality then Content Composer may well be a smart bet. In terms of the package the price is very viable. Unique product creating a new market niche and saving loads of management and creative time
Just go to Content Composer’s salespage to find out more!
Oh, I just checked, there is a money back guarantee. If you have the money but are not sure then take Content Composer for a test drive. If it is useful, then keep it, if not well, just take advantage of the refund guarantee.
Interested In These?
With the rise in spun or rewritten article submissions has come a new problem. Article directories that insist on original content and actively check for it – sites such as EzineArticles.com are now suspending user accounts for using plagiarised content in their articles.
Sometimes the suggestion is justified – too many people still think that changing a few words in a PLR article makes it unique and gives them copyright.
However, many users of rewriting tools are simply the victims of circumstance. What happens is that the writer researches and creates a genuinely original article, written in his own voice and with an orginal slant. Then the writer uses Content Composer or other rewriting or spinning tools to create multiple versions of the same article – again a valid approach.
The problem is that with some/most tools all that happens is that the writer makes several versions of the article and then the phrases or sentences are mixed together from the different versions, creating many new versions of the article. When these articles are submitted then any plagiarism detection tool will pick up that a particular phrase has been used in more than one version of the article and it is flagged as being plagiarised/copied work.
ContentComposer is not so likely to have this problem as it uses both substitution at the phrase/sentence level, but also at the individual word level – one of the reasons it is so useful for creating good articles from the LSI (latent semantic indexing) perspective.
But, even users of Content Composer can come unstuck!
However there is a solution.
Keep a paper trail/audit trail of all your work. Some tools make this easier than others, but when EzineArticles ask you to prove that your work is really your own some kind of record is very handy!
Ona simple level, PLR Spinner from Cuztech enables the user to simply cut and paste all the intro paragraphs into a single text file. Showing any enquirer the dated list of paragraphs and titles should suffice.
With Content Composer a simple copy/paste of the original document setup window with its tokens should demonstrate what has been done and a copy of the text file itself would be confirmation. The important thing is to keep these records and not to discard them just because the article has been used!
As the article marketing enviornment becomes more sophisticated we need to keep up to date with developments and use tools that enable us to manage change within our internet marketing business.
Interested In These?
- 6 Common Categories of Lathes | Lathes Cnc Milling Machine
- Article Submission As A Technique To Publicise Your Webpage | Attorney Directory | Attorney Search
- What is the importance of article submission for a SEO? | homecenterjob
- Tour Dates: Skacore Records and FloridaSka.com present “The SkaFEST 2010 Tour”
- Gross Domestic Income shows more sluggish recovery | Investing Contrarian
Filed under Article Rewriter, Content Composer, Content Strategy, Duplicate Content, Plagiarism Check by on Aug 1st, 2007. Comment. 
From another forum to which I contribute comes the inspiration for this post about Article Announcer and the ContentComposer duplicate content checker.
A poster asked about Article Announcer being featured in one of the ContentComposer demo videos. Confusion had arisen because Article Announcer was featured in submitting content to article directories. So I felt I’d address the issue here. Article Announcer is a premium article submission tool, one of its leading benefits is that one can submit different versions of articles to article directories and thus avoid any possible issues in respect of duplicated content filters.
Article Announcer is one of Jason Potash’s products so it seems to me to be perfectly sensible for him to feature it in his promotional tools. Content Composer does mesh very nicely with Article Announcer and the ‘Auto-rotate’ functionality but there is not any NEED for AA in a ContentComposer environment. In fact, the competing Article Post Robot also enables the use of multiple versions of articles to article directories and it is much cheaper than Article Announcer. Although it is not as complete a system, APR is a very fine piece of software.
So, among the most important benefits that one might look for in an article submssion software to be used with ContentComposer is the ability for the submitter to handle different versions of the article.
At the same time a question was raised about the use of the plagiarism detector in ContentComposer. A suggestion was made that its primary reason for being was to enable Content Composer users to more easily get away with plagiarism. This is not so.
The plagiarism detector is a part of the content management toolbox. As our businesses grow we start to need to source our own content; we outgrow PLR and syndicated sources as sole suppliers and need to employ our own writers, usually as freelancers. Sadly, not all of these writers are entirely honest and they will try to re-use content or fob the buyer off with plagiarised material. Very sensibly ContentComposer incorporates a tool to help manage this real issue. Of course, the owner of CC can also use it to compare his own writing with that of his source materials, a perfectly legitimate use. Of course though, like almost any tool, ContentComposer’s plagiarism detector can be used for bad purposes and also aid the determined copyright infringer.
I suggested to the poster that if the first and lasting impression of the use of the plagiarism detector was to enable ContentComposer users to get away with plagiarism then his business was probably not at the stage of development to warrant buying into this content management tool. ContentComposer is NOT suitable for every business at every stage of its development. Chances are that if there is no content strategy in place then CC will not be fully occupied, although for businesses growing and systematising ContentComposer probably makes a lot of sense as a tool for now and the future.
For readers of these posts, please remember, ContentComposer is not just an article rewriting tool. Whilst content spinning is a part of ContentComposer’s functionality, the reason for the existance of CC is as a tool for managing the content creation process from end to end.
Andrew.
Recent Comments